EViews Tutorial

cointegration and error ecorrection models in eviews

share content

stay connected

buy the material

cointegration model : engle and granger methodology

In univariate models, we have seen that if a variable is non stationary, we can apply first differences, and then we can forecast future values using an ARIMA model. However, when working with multiple variables, the process is not that straightforward. Two variables may be non-stationary, but there can exist a linear combination between them that is stationary. In such case, the variables hold a long run relationship and the model can be estimated using an error correction model. By watching

what is cointegration?

Two or more variables are said to be cointegrated, if they are integrated of the same order but exists a cointegrating vector of coefficients that forms a stationary linear combination of them. A cointegration test is used to determine whether the variables hold a long run relationship (equilibrium). For example, imports and exports in Canada seem to move closely together and be in equilibrium. If imports grow more than exports, in the long run export will increase and imports will decrease (to keep a positive trade balance). There exists a correction mechanism that drives the disequilibrium back to equilibrium. In this tutorial we will check if import and exports in Canada are cointegrated or they are just a spurious regression.

what are we going to cover in part 1:

Part 1, you are going to learn:

Spurious Regression vs Cointegration
What happens if variables are non sationary
What happens if variables are non stationary but hold a long run relationship
How to test for cointegration with unit root tests
How to test for cointegration with cointegration tests (i.e, Engle and Granger and Phillips Ouliaris)
How to estimate the Long Run Model

Cointegration vs spurious Regression

If the variables do not hold a long run relationship, we are in the presence of a spurious regression. But, how do we know if the variables do not hold a long-run equilibrium?

According to Newbold and Granger (1974), spurious regression signs are:

High $R^2$ and low Durbin Watson statistic. (Rule of thumb: $R^2$ >DW. statistic)
T-Statistics are very high: Variables are highly significant.
Residuals of the regression between the variables of our model are not stationary.

Implications of spurious regressions

Spurious regressions have no economic interpretation. The model will seem to have significant statistics, but they have no real sense. Two variables that have a positive trend may be highly correlated, but they don’t explain each other. Spurious regressions will arrive to non-sense conclusions.

cointegration: money demand example

A classic example in the literature is the money demand model. The classic money market hypothesis states that the market is in equilibrium and clears. (Money Demand = Money Supply). In other words, if money demand increases, money supply will eventually meet the demand. There is a long run relationship.

$m_t=\beta_0+\beta_1p_t+\beta_2y_t+\beta_3r_t+\epsilon_t$

Where:

$m_t$ = Money Demand
$p_t$ = Price Level
$y_t$ = Real Income
$r_t$ = Interest Rate
$\epsilon_t$ = Stationary Disturbance Term

From classic theory, the terms estimated ( $B_i$ ) should have the following signs:

$\beta_1$ >0 : if the prices in the economy increase, individuals will demand more money to pay for goods and services.

$\beta_2$ >0 : when your income increases, your demand for money increases.

$\beta_3$ <0 : If interest rates increase, the price of money increases. Borrowing money becomes more expensive. Money demand will decrease.

$\epsilon_t$ = The disurbance terms needs to be stationary. Otherwise, any shock in the model would cause a permanent deviation from the equilibrium.

implications of the money demand example

The main issue with the money demand model is that all the variables are non stationary in levels (i.e., they are I(1)).

How can the model be in equilibrium?
What are the implications for the model if the variables are non stationary?

If the variables are non stationary, any shock in the model will have a permanent effect. If there are any deviations from the equilibrium, there would be no return. The market would never be in equilibrium and would never clear. If there is a shock in the demand, the demand would increase and supply would never meet the demand.

So how can non-stationary variables be in equilibrium? The answer is simple. There is a linear combination between the variables that makes the residuals stationary.

$\epsilon_t=m_t-\beta_0-\beta_1p_t-\beta_2y_t-\beta_3r_t$

where $\epsilon_t=I(0)$

cointegration: engle and granger method

Now that we have covered the difference between cointegration and spurious regressions and have also gone through an example of cointegrated variables, let’s talk about how to verify if two (or more) variables are cointegrated.

Engle and Granger: 2 steps method

Step 1: Long run regression

The first step is to verify that the variables are integrated of the same order. To do so, check for stationarity and ensure that your variables are all I(1), (or higher order). If the order of integration of your variables are different, we cannot proceed.

Once we ensure the variables are integrated of the same order, we can estimate the long run regression. If you are wondering what the long run regression is, it’s just your linear regression model.

In our example, we are estimating a model about trade balance in Canada. Exports are explained by a constant and imports. What is the intuition behind the model? On the first hand, imports are required for a country to grow and be able to produce goods to export. On the other hand, we know that imports cannot exceed imports (in a systematic way). There can be periods when imports grow more than exports (resulting in a negative trade balance), but over the next periods, countries will try to stabilize the external balance. Consequently, there will be a long run relationship between exports and imports. There has to be an equilibrium over time.

long run regression

The long run regression in our model is represented by:

$X_t=\beta_0+\beta_1M_t+e_t$

Where $X_t= exports$ , and $M_t= imports$ .

save the residuals and check for stationarity

Once we estimated our model, we can save the residuals and perform the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test on the residual series. We need to ensure that the residuals are stationary.

engle granger cointegration test critical values

If you are using an unit root test (i.e., Augmented Dickey Fuller) to test for the stationarity of the residuals, you need to use the critical values of the cointegration tables. The p-value reported in the Augmented-Dickey fuller test is correct, however, the critical values are not. Why? We cannot use the critical values of the unit root tests for a series that results from an estimated regression (a non observable series).

Using the cointegration tables, we reject the null hypothesis of the augmented Dickey Fuller test. Our residual series is stationary.

EViews Tutorial

Part 2

Estimate the short run model
Error correction term details
Model Diagnostics
In sample Forecast

short run model: error correction model

We have estimated the long run model. Now it’s time to estimate the short run model. For the short run model, the variables need to be in differences – stationary form, and we need to incorporate to the model the error correction term. The error correction terms are the residuals of the long run regression but lagged one period.

error correction term - residuals lagged one period

$\epsilon_{t-1}=X_t - \beta_0 - \beta_1 M_{t-1}~~~(1)$

variables in their stationary form (in 1st differences)

$\triangle X_t=\beta_0+\beta_1 \triangle M_t + \beta_2\epsilon_{t-1}+\nu_t~~~(2) \\$

Plug equation (1) in (2) and you obtain to the short run model

$\triangle X_t=\beta_0+\beta_1 \triangle M_t + \beta_2(X_t - \beta_0 - \beta_1 M_{t-1})+\nu_t~~~(3)\\$

cointegration: error correction term interpretation

$\triangle X_t=\beta_0+\beta_1 \triangle M_t + \beta_2\epsilon_{t-1}+\nu_t~~~(2) \\$

$\beta_2$ is the error correction term estimated coefficient, where -1< $\beta_2$ <0
Values out of the range are explosive results. You need to review/re-estimate your model.
The coefficient determines the “speed of adjustment” towards the long run equilibrium.
The deviations from the long-run equilibrium are corrected gradually by the error correction term through a series of partial short-run adjustments.
If the Error correction term is close to 1, it means that almost 100% of the deviations are corrected withing a period (period depends on the frequency of your data: daility, monthly, quarterly, etc).
If the error term is close to 0, the model is very slow to return to an equilibrium after a shock.

short run and long run estimated model

long run model

$X_t= -0.43 + 1.02 M_t + \epsilon_t$

short run model

$X_t= 0.009 + 0.64 M_t -0.11\epsilon_{t-1} + \nu_t$

interpretation of the model

A 1% increase in imports, results in a 1.02% increase in exports. The results are appropriate since in the long run, export grow more than imports.
The short run model is telling us that 11% of the deviations from the long run equilibrium are corrected within a period (In our example, a period is a quarter since we are working with quarterly data).
The speed of adjustment in our model is slow. It would take around 9 periods to achieve equilibrium.

Final step: model diagnostics

residuals normality test

Jarque-Bera Statistic for testing normality
H0= Residuals are Normally distributed
If p>0.05, residuals are normally distributed

serial correlation

As we have lagged variables, DW statistics is no longer valid.
You can check for the correlogram – Q statistic
H0= No serial Correlation
or, Serial Correlation LM test – Breusch-Godfrey test
H0= No Serial Correlation

heteroskedasticity

In the presence of heteroskedasticity, standard errors are no longer valid
Conduct the Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey test
H0= Homoskedasticity

in sample forecast

recommended literature

Yule (1926)

“Why do we Sometimes get Nonsense-Correlations between Time-Series?- A Study in Sampling and the Nature of Time-Series”

Granger and Newbold (1974)

“Spurious Regressions in Econometrics”

Engle and Granger (1987)

“Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”

Stock (1987)

“Asymptotic Properties of Least Squares Estimators of Cointegrating Vectors”

Download the dataset for free and replicate the content covered in the video

Download the Data Set for Free (direct download, no adds).

$4.99 CAD

PRemium Content

check out other free courses

book a meeting

Do you need help with your research plan?

Are you stuck and need help to design/plan your thesis topic and methodology?

buy the material

Elevate your learning experience. You can buy the package for each of the tutorials. Each package contains the slides of the video + Workfile/Do File + Data & Support

EViews Tutorial

cointegration and error ecorrection models in eviews

share content

stay connected

buy the material

cointegration model : engle and granger methodology

what is cointegration?

what are we going to cover in part 1:

Cointegration vs spurious Regression

Implications of spurious regressions

cointegration: money demand example

implications of the money demand example

cointegration: engle and granger method

Engle and Granger: 2 steps method

Step 1: Long run regression

long run regression

save the residuals and check for stationarity

engle granger cointegration test critical values

EViews Tutorial

Part 2

short run model: error correction model

error correction term - residuals lagged one period

variables in their stationary form (in 1st differences)

Plug equation (1) in (2) and you obtain to the short run model

cointegration: error correction term interpretation

short run and long run estimated model

long run model

short run model

interpretation of the model

Final step: model diagnostics

residuals normality test

serial correlation

heteroskedasticity

in sample forecast

recommended literature

Download the dataset for free and replicate the content covered in the video

$4.99 CAD

PRemium Content

check out other free courses

Stata

LaTex with overleaf

book a meeting

buy the material

share content

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Courses

Actions

Shortcuts

newsletter